SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1511.04303

Experimental Evaluation of Distributed Node Coloring Algorithms for Wireless Networks

Abstract

In this paper we evaluate distributed node coloring algorithms for wireless networks using the network simulator Sinalgo [by DCG@ETHZ]. All considered algorithms operate in the realistic signal-to-interference-and-noise-ratio (SINR) model of interference. We evaluate two recent coloring algorithms, Rand4DColor and ColorReduction (in the following ColorRed), proposed by Fuchs and Prutkin in [SIROCCO'15], the MW-Coloring algorithm introduced by Moscibroda and Wattenhofer [DC'08] and transferred to the SINR model by Derbel and Talbi [ICDCS'10], and a variant of the coloring algorithm of Yu et al. [TCS'14]. We additionally consider several practical improvements to the algorithms and evaluate their performance in both static and dynamic scenarios. Our experiments show that Rand4DColor is very fast, computing a valid (4Degree)-coloring in less than one third of the time slots required for local broadcasting, where Degree is the maximum node degree in the network. Regarding other O(Degree)-coloring algorithms Rand4DColor is at least 4 to 5 times faster. Additionally, the algorithm is robust even in networks with mobile nodes and an additional listening phase at the start of the algorithm makes Rand4DColor robust against the late wake-up of large parts of the network. Regarding (Degree+1)-coloring algorithms, we observe that ColorRed it is significantly faster than the considered variant of the Yu et al. coloring algorithm, which is the only other (Degree+1)-coloring algorithm for the SINR model. Further improvement can be made with an error-correcting variant that increases the runtime by allowing some uncertainty in the communication and afterwards correcting the introduced conflicts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fabian Fuchs. 2015-11-13. Experimental Evaluation of Distributed Node Coloring Algorithms for Wireless Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.04303

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS