SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1512.06101

Recognizable sets and Woodin cardinals: Computation beyond the constructible universe

Abstract

We call a subset of an ordinal $\lambda$ recognizable if it is the unique subset $x$ of $\lambda$ for which some Turing machine with ordinal time and tape, which halts for all subsets of $\lambda$ as input, halts with the final state $0$. Equivalently, such a set is the unique subset $x$ which satisfies a given $\Sigma_1$ formula in $L[x]$. We prove several results about sets of ordinals recognizable from ordinal parameters by ordinal time Turing machines. Notably we show the following results from large cardinals. (1) Computable sets are elements of $L$, while recognizable objects with infinite time computations appear up to the level of Woodin cardinals. (2) A subset of a countable ordinal $\lambda$ is in the recognizable closure for subsets of $\lambda$ if and only if it is an element of $M^{\infty}$, where $M^{\infty}$ denotes the inner model obtained by iterating the least measure of $M_1$ through the ordinals, and where the recognizable closure for subsets of $\lambda$ is defined by closing under relative recognizability for subsets of $\lambda$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Merlin Carl, Philipp Schlicht, Philip Welch. 2015-12-18. Recognizable sets and Woodin cardinals: Computation beyond the constructible universe. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2017.12.007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO