Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1601.05744

Sub-Optimal Multi-Phase Path Planning: A Method for Solving Rubik's Revenge

Jared Weed
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Rubik's Revenge, a 4x4x4 variant of the Rubik's puzzles, remains to date as an unsolved puzzle. That is to say, we do not have a method or successful categorization to optimally solve every one of its approximately $7.401 \times 10^{45}$ possible configurations. Rubik's Cube, Rubik's Revenge's predecessor (3x3x3), with its approximately $4.33 \times 10^{19}$ possible configurations, has only recently been completely solved by Rokicki et. al, further finding that any configuration requires no more than 20 moves. With the sheer dimension of Rubik's Revenge and its total configuration space, a brute-force method of finding all optimal solutions would be in vain. Similar to the methods used by Rokicki et. al on Rubik's Cube, in this paper we develop a method for solving arbitrary configurations of Rubik's Revenge in phases, using a combination of a powerful algorithm known as IDA* and a useful definition of distance in the cube space. While time-series results were not successfully gathered, it will be shown that this method far outweighs current human-solving methods and can be used to determine loose upper bounds for the cube space. Discussion will suggest that this method can also be applied to other puzzles with the proper transformations.

Explore related subjects

math.HOcs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jared Weed. 2016-01-20. Sub-Optimal Multi-Phase Path Planning: A Method for Solving Rubik's Revenge. https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05744

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗