SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1603.02485

The Block Pseudo-Marginal Sampler

Abstract

The pseudo-marginal (PM) approach is increasingly used for Bayesian inference in statistical models, where the likelihood is intractable but can be estimated unbiasedly. %Examples include random effect models, state-space models and data subsampling in big-data settings. Deligiannidis et al. (2016) show how the PM approach can be made much more efficient by correlating the underlying Monte Carlo (MC) random numbers used to form the estimate of the likelihood at the current and proposed values of the unknown parameters. Their approach greatly speeds up the standard PM algorithm, as it requires a much smaller number of samples or particles to form the optimal likelihood estimate. Our paper presents an alternative implementation of the correlated PM approach, called the block PM, which divides the underlying random numbers into blocks so that the likelihood estimates for the proposed and current values of the parameters only differ by the random numbers in one block. We show that this implementation of the correlated PM can be much more efficient for some specific problems than the implementation in Deligiannidis et al. (2016); for example when the likelihood is estimated by subsampling or the likelihood is a product of terms each of which is given by an integral which can be estimated unbiasedly by randomised quasi-Monte Carlo. Our article provides methodology and guidelines for efficiently implementing the block PM. A second advantage of the the block PM is that it provides a direct way to control the correlation between the logarithms of the estimates of the likelihood at the current and proposed values of the parameters than the implementation in Deligiannidis et al. (2016). We obtain methods and guidelines for selecting the optimal number of samples based on idealized but realistic assumptions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

M. -N. Tran, R. Kohn, M. Quiroz, M. Villani. 2016-03-08. The Block Pseudo-Marginal Sampler. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.02485

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME