Online Truthful Mechanisms for Multi-sided Markets

Moran Feldman; Rica Gonen

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1604.04859

Online Truthful Mechanisms for Multi-sided Markets

Moran Feldman·Rica Gonen

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The study of mechanisms for multi-sided markets has received an increasingly growing attention from the research community, and is motivated by the numerous examples of such markets on the web and in electronic commerce. Many of these examples represent dynamic and uncertain environments, and thus, require, in fact, online mechanisms. Unfortunately, as far as we know, no previously published online mechanism for a multi-sided market (or even for a double-sided market) has managed to (approximately) maximize the gain from trade, while guaranteeing desirable economic properties such as incentivizing truthfulness, voluntary participation and avoiding budget deficit. In this work we present the first online mechanism for a multi-sided market which has the above properties. Our mechanism is designed for a market setting suggested by [Feldman and Gonen (2016)]; which is motivated by the foreseeable future form of online advertising. The online nature of our setting motivated us to define a stronger notion of individual rationality, called "continuous individual rationality", capturing the natural requirement that a player should never lose either by participating in the mechanism or by not leaving prematurely. Satisfying the requirements of continuous individual rationality, together with the other economic properties our mechanism guarantees, requires the mechanism to use a novel pricing scheme where users may be paid ongoing increments during the mechanism's execution up to a pre-known maximum value. As users rarely ever get paid in reality, this pricing scheme is new to mechanism design. Nevertheless, the principle it is based on can be observed in many common real life scenarios such as executive compensation payments and company acquisition deals. We believe both our new dynamic pricing scheme concept and our strengthened notion of individual rationality are of independent interest.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Moran Feldman, Rica Gonen. 2016-04-17. Online Truthful Mechanisms for Multi-sided Markets. https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.04859

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗