Parameterized Complexity and Approximation Issues for the Colorful Components Problems

Riccardo Dondi; Florian Sikora

doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2018.04.044

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1605.03071

Parameterized Complexity and Approximation Issues for the Colorful Components Problems

Riccardo Dondi·Florian Sikora

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The quest for colorful components (connected components where each color is associated with at most one vertex) inside a vertex-colored graph has been widely considered in the last ten years. Here we consider two variants, Minimum Colorful Components (MCC) and Maximum Edges in transitive Closure (MEC), introduced in 2011 in the context of orthology gene identification in bioinformatics. The input of both MCC and MEC is a vertex-colored graph. MCC asks for the removal of a subset of edges, so that the resulting graph is partitioned in the minimum number of colorful connected components; MEC asks for the removal of a subset of edges, so that the resulting graph is partitioned in colorful connected components and the number of edges in the transitive closure of such a graph is maximized. We study the parameterized and approximation complexity of MCC and MEC, for general and restricted instances. For MCC on trees we show that the problem is basically equivalent to Minimum Cut on Trees, thus MCC is not approximable within factor $1.36 - \varepsilon$, it is fixed-parameter tractable and it admits a poly-kernel (when the parameter is the number of colorful components). Moreover, we show that MCC, while it is polynomial time solvable on paths, it is NP-hard even for graphs with constant distance to disjoint paths number. Then we consider the parameterized complexity of MEC when parameterized by the number $k$ of edges in the transitive closure of a solution (the graph obtained by removing edges so that it is partitioned in colorful connected components). We give a fixed-parameter algorithm for MEC paramterized by $k$ and, when the input graph is a tree, we give a poly-kernel.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Riccardo Dondi, Florian Sikora. 2016-05-10. Parameterized Complexity and Approximation Issues for the Colorful Components Problems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2018.04.044

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗