arXiv · 1605.03604
Errors and pseudo-thresholds for incoherent and coherent noise
Abstract
We compare the effect of single qubit incoherent and coherent errors on the logical error rate of the Steane [[7,1,3]] quantum error correction code by performing an exact full-density-matrix simulation of an error correction step. We find that the effective 1-qubit process matrix at the logical level reveals the key differences between the error models and provides insight into why the Pauli twirling approximation is a good approximation for incoherent errors and a poor approximation for coherent ones. Approximate channels composed of Clifford operations and Pauli measurement operators that are pessimistic at the physical level result in pessimistic error rates at the logical level. In addition, we observe that the pseudo-threshold can differ by a factor of five depending on whether the error is calculated using the fidelity or the distance.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Mauricio Gutiérrez, Conor Smith, Livia Lulushi, Smitha Janardan, Kenneth R. Brown. 2016-05-11. Errors and pseudo-thresholds for incoherent and coherent noise. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.94.042338
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.