Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1606.08645

Biconnectivity, $st$-numbering and other applications of DFS using $O(n)$ bits

Sankardeep Chakraborty·Venkatesh Raman·Srinivasa Rao Satti
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider space efficient implementations of some classical applications of DFS including the problem of testing biconnectivity and $2$-edge connectivity, finding cut vertices and cut edges, computing chain decomposition and $st$-numbering of a given undirected graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. Classical algorithms for them typically use DFS and some $\Omega (\lg n)$ bits\footnote{We use $\lg$ to denote logarithm to the base $2$.} of information at each vertex. Building on a recent $O(n)$-bits implementation of DFS due to Elmasry et al. (STACS 2015) we provide $O(n)$-bit implementations for all these applications of DFS. Our algorithms take $O(m \lg^c n \lg\lg n)$ time for some small constant $c$ (where $c \leq 2$). Central to our implementation is a succinct representation of the DFS tree and a space efficient partitioning of the DFS tree into connected subtrees, which maybe of independent interest for designing other space efficient graph algorithms.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sankardeep Chakraborty, Venkatesh Raman, Srinivasa Rao Satti. 2016-06-28. Biconnectivity, $st$-numbering and other applications of DFS using $O(n)$ bits. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08645

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗