SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1607.00138

Representing Pattern Matching Algorithms by Polynomial-Size Automata

Abstract

Pattern matching algorithms to find exact occurrences of a pattern $S\in\Sigma^m$ in a text $T\in\Sigma^n$ have been analyzed extensively with respect to asymptotic best, worst, and average case runtime. For more detailed analyses, the number of text character accesses $X^{\mathcal{A},S}_n$ performed by an algorithm $\mathcal{A}$ when searching a random text of length $n$ for a fixed pattern $S$ has been considered. Constructing a state space and corresponding transition rules (e.g. in a Markov chain) that reflect the behavior of a pattern matching algorithm is a key step in existing analyses of $X^{\mathcal{A},S}_n$ in both the asymptotic ($n\to\infty$) and the non-asymptotic regime. The size of this state space is hence a crucial parameter for such analyses. In this paper, we introduce a general methodology to construct corresponding state spaces and demonstrate that it applies to a wide range of algorithms, including Boyer-Moore (BM), Boyer-Moore-Horspool (BMH), Backward Oracle Matching (BOM), and Backward (Non-Deterministic) DAWG Matching (B(N)DM). In all cases except BOM, our method leads to state spaces of size $O(m^3)$ for pattern length $m$, a result that has previously only been obtained for BMH. In all other cases, only state spaces with size exponential in $m$ had been reported. Our results immediately imply an algorithm to compute the distribution of $X^{\mathcal{A},S}_n$ for fixed $S$, fixed $n$, and $\mathcal{A}\in\{\text{BM},\text{BMH},\text{B(N)DM}\}$ in polynomial time for a very general class of random text models.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tobias Marschall, Noemi E. Passing. 2016-07-01. Representing Pattern Matching Algorithms by Polynomial-Size Automata. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00138

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS