SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1607.08337

Efficient Algorithms for Constructing Very Sparse Spanners and Emulators

Abstract

Miller et al. \cite{MPVX15} devised a distributed\footnote{They actually showed a PRAM algorithm. The distributed algorithm with these properties is implicit in \cite{MPVX15}.} algorithm in the CONGEST model, that given a parameter $k = 1,2,\ldots$, constructs an $O(k)$-spanner of an input unweighted $n$-vertex graph with $O(n^{1+1/k})$ expected edges in $O(k)$ rounds of communication. In this paper we improve the result of \cite{MPVX15}, by showing a $k$-round distributed algorithm in the same model, that constructs a $(2k-1)$-spanner with $O(n^{1+1/k}/\epsilon)$ edges, with probability $1- \epsilon$, for any $\epsilon>0$. Moreover, when $k = \omega(\log n)$, our algorithm produces (still in $k$ rounds) {\em ultra-sparse} spanners, i.e., spanners of size $n(1+ o(1))$, with probability $1- o(1)$. To our knowledge, this is the first distributed algorithm in the CONGEST or in the PRAM models that constructs spanners or skeletons (i.e., connected spanning subgraphs) that sparse. Our algorithm can also be implemented in linear time in the standard centralized model, and for large $k$, it provides spanners that are sparser than any other spanner given by a known (near-)linear time algorithm. We also devise improved bounds (and algorithms realizing these bounds) for $(1+\epsilon,\beta)$-spanners and emulators. In particular, we show that for any unweighted $n$-vertex graph and any $\epsilon > 0$, there exists a $(1+ \epsilon, ({{\log\log n} \over \epsilon})^{\log\log n})$-emulator with $O(n)$ edges. All previous constructions of $(1+\epsilon,\beta)$-spanners and emulators employ a superlinear number of edges, for all choices of parameters. Finally, we provide some applications of our results to approximate shortest paths' computation in unweighted graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Elkin, Ofer Neiman. 2016-07-28. Efficient Algorithms for Constructing Very Sparse Spanners and Emulators. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08337

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS