SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1608.03368

Bi-Arc Digraphs and Conservative Polymorphisms

Abstract

In this paper we study the class of bi-arc digraphs, important from two seemingly unrelated perspectives. On the one hand, they are precisely the digraphs that admit certain polymorphisms of interest in the study of constraint satisfaction problems; on the other hand, they are a very broad generalization of interval graphs. Bi-arc digraphs is the class of digraphs that admit conservative semilattice polymorphisms. There is much interest in understanding structures that admit particular types of polymorphisms, and especially in their recognition algorithms. (Such problems are referred to as metaproblems.) Surprisingly, the class of bi-arc digraphs also describes the class of digraphs that admit certain other kinds of conservative polymorphisms. Thus solving the recognition problem for bi-arc digraphs solves the metaproblem for digraphs for several types of conservative polymorphisms. The complexity of the recognition problem for digraphs with conservative semilattice polymorphisms was an open problem, while it was known to be NP-complete for certain more complex relational structures. We complement our result by providing a complete dichotomy classification of which general relational structures have polynomial or NP-complete recognition problems for the existence of conservative semilattice polymorphisms. Bi-arc digraphs also generalizes the class of interval graphs; in fact it reduces to the class of interval graphs for symmetric and reflexive digraphs. It is much broader than interval graphs and includes other generalizations of interval graphs such as co-threshold tolerance graphs and adjusted interval digraphs. Yet, it is still a reasonable extension of interval graphs, in the sense that it keeps much of the appeal of interval graphs. Our main result is a forbidden obstruction characterization of, and a polynomial recognition for, the class of bi-arc digraphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Pavol Hell, Akbar Rafiey, Arash Rafiey. 2016-08-11. Bi-Arc Digraphs and Conservative Polymorphisms. https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03368

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS