Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1609.04471

Sort Race

Hantao Zhang·Baoluo Meng·Yiwen Liang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sorting is one of the oldest computing problems and is still very important in the age of big data. Various algorithms and implementation techniques have been proposed. In this study, we focus on comparison based, internal sorting algorithms. We created 12 data types of various sizes for experiments and tested extensively various implementations in a single setting. Using some effective techniques, we discovered that quicksort is adaptive to nearly sorted inputs and is still the best overall sorting algorithm. We also identified which techniques are effective in timsort, one of the most popular and efficient sorting method based on natural mergesort, and created our version of mergesort, which runs faster than timsort on nearly sorted instances. Our implementations of quicksort and mergesort are different from other implementations reported in all textbooks or research articles, faster than any version of the C library qsort functions, not only for randomly generated data, but also for various types of nearly sorted data. This experiment can help the user to choose the best sorting algorithm for the hard sorting job at hand. This work provides a platform for anyone to test their own sorting algorithm against the best in the field.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hantao Zhang, Baoluo Meng, Yiwen Liang. 2016-09-14. Sort Race. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04471

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗