Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1610.04825

Where Do the Terms of the Power Series Expansions of Sine and Cosine Functions Come from? Involutes!

V. N. Krishnachandran
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the 1930's, a Russian school teacher Y. S. Chaikovsky presented a proof of the power series expansion of the sine and cosine functions without using calculus. In doing so he also showed the geometrical meanings of the various terms in these power series expansions. Chaikovsky's ideas were first published by Leo S. Gurin as a Note in the American Mathematical Monthly in 1996. The proofs, though they use only elementary mathematics, require some combinatorial arguments which may be hard even for bright students. This paper is an attempt to bring the ideas of Chaikovsky once again to the attention of the mathematics teachers and students. The emphasis in this paper is on establishing the geometrical meanings of the various terms in the power series expansions of sine and cosine functions. This has been done taking recourse to methods of calculus. Since the concept of an involute is crucial in this investigation, we have also included a brief discussion on the concept of an involute of a curve and also a Maxima procedure for computing the parametric equations of the involute of a given curve.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

V. N. Krishnachandran. 2016-10-16. Where Do the Terms of the Power Series Expansions of Sine and Cosine Functions Come from? Involutes!. https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.04825

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗