SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1611.01017

On Computing the Dollo-1 phylogeny in polynomial time

Abstract

The Dollo model for reconstructing evolutionary trees from binary characters has been proposed as a generalization of the infinite sites model, also known as the Perfect Phylogeny. In particular, the Dollo model is considered more realistic than the Perfect Phylogeny for inferring the evolution of tumor mutations. In the case of binary matrices, the Dollo-$k$ model requires an evolutionary tree in which each character, corresponding to a column in the input matrix, may change from $0$ to $1$ at most once, and from $1$ to $0$ at most $k$ times throughout the entire tree. Given a binary matrix, the problem of deciding whether there exists a Dollo-$k$ tree compatible with the matrix is NP-complete for any fixed $k \geq 2$, while computing a Dollo-$0$ tree corresponds to the Perfect Phylogeny decision problem, which admits a simple linear-time algorithm. The Dollo-$1$ tree problem corresponds to the Persistent Phylogeny problem, whose computational complexity, albeit under an equivalent formulation, was posed as an open question 20 years ago. We solve this problem by presenting a polynomial-time algorithm for the Persistent Phylogeny problem. Our solution relies on efficiently solving a specific class of binary matrices, represented as bipartite graphs called \emph{skeleton graphs}, or simply skeletons. In these graphs, characters are \emph{maximal}, that is their corresponding sets of species are not related by inclusion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Paola Bonizzoni, Gianluca Della Vedova, Mauricio Soto Gomez, Gabriella Trucco. 2016-11-03. On Computing the Dollo-1 phylogeny in polynomial time. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.01017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS