Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1611.07371

Lazy Local Search Meets Machine Scheduling

Chidambaram Annamalai
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the restricted case of Scheduling on Unrelated Parallel Machines. In this problem, we are given a set of jobs $J$ with processing times $p_j$ and each job may be scheduled only on some subset of machines $S_j \subseteq M$. The goal is to find an assignment of jobs to machines to minimize the time by which all jobs can be processed. In a seminal paper, Lenstra, Shmoys, and Tardos designed an elegant $2$-approximation for the problem in 1987. The question of whether approximation algorithms with better guarantees exist for this classic scheduling problem has since remained a source of mystery. In recent years, with the improvement of our understanding of Configuration LPs, it now appears an attainable goal to design such an algorithm. Our main contribution is to make progress towards this goal. When the processing times of jobs are either $1$ or $\epsilon \in (0,1)$, we design an approximation algorithm whose guarantee tends to $1 + \sqrt{3}/2 \approx 1.8660254,$ for the interesting cases when $\epsilon \to 0$. This improves on the $2-\epsilon_0$ guarantee recently obtained by Chakrabarty, Khanna, and Li for some constant $\epsilon_0 > 0$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chidambaram Annamalai. 2016-11-22. Lazy Local Search Meets Machine Scheduling. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07371

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗