SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1611.08377

English-Medium Instruction Calculus: Is flipping helpful?

Abstract

This paper addresses some of the experiences encountered and some of the strategies utilized while using flipped classroom pedagogy in an undergraduate Single Variable Calculus (SVC) course in a Confucian Heritage Culture (CHC) environment. Due to issues related to instructor-student communication and students' learning styles, a theoretical framework is built upon three components for learning environments: inverted Bloom's taxonomy for educational learning objectives, English-medium instruction (EMI) and integrating technology in the classroom. In this study, four different types of instruction were designed; three classes were flipped while the fourth acts as a control. Type A means entirely flipped with instructor-created videos and integrating CAS {\sl Maxima}. Type B means entirely flipped with third-party videos. Type C is similar to Type A, but instead of the entire course being flipped, a single topic is flipped. Type D uses the traditional lecture style. By considering exam scores and students' feedback, both quantitative and qualitative aspects of the flipped pedagogy were investigated. Quantitative analysis indicates a statistically significant difference in the exam scores between instruction Type A and Type C as determined by one-way ANOVA ($F(3,306) = 2.67$, $p = 0.0477$) with small practical significance of the effect size ($\eta^2 = 0.0255$). Qualitative findings suggest that although students' engagement and communication with instructors have been enhanced, some challenges related to language and culture, along with minimizing competition and learning about a new technological tool remain to persist.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

N. Karjanto, L. Simon. 2016-11-25. English-Medium Instruction Calculus: Is flipping helpful?. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08377

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO