SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1611.09589

On a symmetrization of hemiimplicative semilattices

Abstract

A hemiimplicative semilattice is a bounded semilattice $(A, \wedge, 1)$ endowed with a binary operation $\to$, satisfying that for every $a, b, c \in A$, $a \leq b \to c$ implies $a \wedge b \leq c$ (that is to say, one of the conditionals satisfied by the residuum of the infimum) and the equation $a \to a = 1$. The class of hemiimplicative semilattices form a variety. These structures provide a general framework for the study of different structures of interest in algebraic logic. In any hemiimplicative semilattice it is possible to define a derived operation by $a \sim b := (a \to b) \wedge (b \to a)$. Endowing $(A, \wedge, 1)$ with the binary operation $\sim$ results again a hemiimplicative semilattice, which also satisfies the identity $a \sim b = b \sim a$. We call the elements of the subvariety of hemiimplicative semilattices satisfying $a \to b = b \to a$, a symmetric hemiimplicative semilattice. In this article, we study the correspondence assigning the symmetric hemiimplicative semilattice $(A, \wedge, \sim , 1)$ to the hemiimplicative semilattice $(A, \wedge, \to, 1)$. In particular, we characterize the image of this correspondence. We also provide many new examples of hemiimplicative semilattice structures on any bounded semillatice (possibly with bottom). Finally, we characterize congruences on the clases of hemiimplicative semilattices introduced as examples and we describe the principal congruences of hemiimplicative semilattices.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

José Luis Castiglioni, Hernán Javier San Martín. 2016-11-29. On a symmetrization of hemiimplicative semilattices. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09589

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO