SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1702.00326

Resolvability in c.c.c. generic extensions

Abstract

Every crowded space $X$ is ${\omega}$-resolvable in the c.c.c generic extension $V^{Fn(|X|,2})$ of the ground model. We investigate what we can say about ${\lambda}$-resolvability in c.c.c-generic extensions for ${\lambda}>{\omega}$? A topological space is "monotonically $\omega_1$-resolvable" if there is a function $f:X\to {\omega_1}$ such that $$\{x\in X: f(x)\ge {\alpha} \}\subset^{dense}X $$ for each ${\alpha}<{\omega_1}$. We show that given a $T_1$ space $X$ the following statements are equivalent: (1) $X$ is ${\omega}_1$-resolvable in some c.c.c-generic extension, (2) $X$ is monotonically $\omega_1$-resolvable. (3) $X$ is ${\omega}_1$-resolvable in the Cohen-generic extension $V^{Fn({\omega_1},2)}$. We investigate which spaces are monotonically $\omega_1$-resolvable. We show that if a topological space $X$ is c.c.c, and ${\omega}_1\le \Delta(X)\le |X|<{\omega}_{\omega}$, then $X$ is monotonically $\omega_1$-resolvable. On the other hand, it is also consistent, modulo the existence of a measurable cardinal, that there is a space $Y$ with $|Y|=\Delta(Y)=\aleph_\omega$ which is not monotonically $\omega_1$-resolvable. The characterization of ${\omega_1}$-resolvability in c.c.c generic extension raises the following question: is it true that crowded spaces from the ground model are ${\omega}$-resolvable in $V^{Fn({\omega},2)}$? We show that (i) if $V=L$ then every crowded c.c.c. space $X$ is ${\omega}$-resolvable in $V^{Fn({\omega},2)}$, (ii) if there is no weakly inaccesssible cardinals, then every crowded space $X$ is ${\omega}$-resolvable in $V^{Fn({\omega}_1,2)}$. On the other hand, it is also consistent that there is a crowded space $X$ with $|X|=\Delta(X)={\omega_1}$ such that $X$ remains irresolvable after adding a single Cohen real.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lajos Soukup, Adrienne Stanley. 2017-02-01. Resolvability in c.c.c. generic extensions. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00326

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN