Maximum Matching in Two, Three, and a Few More Passes Over Graph Streams

Sagar Kale; Sumedh Tirodkar

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1702.02559

Maximum Matching in Two, Three, and a Few More Passes Over Graph Streams

Sagar Kale·Sumedh Tirodkar

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the maximum matching problem in the semi-streaming model formalized by Feigenbaum, Kannan, McGregor, Suri, and Zhang that is inspired by giant graphs of today. As our main result, we give a two-pass $(1/2 + 1/16)$-approximation algorithm for triangle-free graphs and a two-pass $(1/2 + 1/32)$-approximation algorithm for general graphs; these improve the approximation ratios of $1/2 + 1/52$ for bipartite graphs and $1/2 + 1/140$ for general graphs by Konrad, Magniez, and Mathieu. In three passes, we achieve approximation ratios of $1/2 + 1/10$ for triangle-free graphs and $1/2 + 1/19.753$ for general graphs. We also give a multi-pass algorithm where we bound the number of passes precisely---we give a $(2/3 -\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm that uses $2/(3\varepsilon)$ passes for triangle-free graphs and $4/(3\varepsilon)$ passes for general graphs. Our algorithms are simple and combinatorial, use $O(n \log n)$ space, and have $O(1)$ update time per edge. For general graphs, our multi-pass algorithm improves the best known deterministic algorithms in terms of the number of passes: --Ahn and Guha give a $(2/3 - \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm that uses $O(\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ passes, whereas our $(2/3 - \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm uses $4/(3\varepsilon)$ passes; --they also give a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm that uses $O(\log n \cdot \mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon))$ passes, where $n$ is the number of vertices of the input graph; although our algorithm is $(2/3 - \varepsilon)$-approximation, our number of passes do not depend on $n$. Earlier multi-pass algorithms either have a large constant inside big-$O$ notation for the number of passes or the constant cannot be determined due to the involved analysis, so our multi-pass algorithm should use much fewer passes for approximation ratios bounded slightly below $2/3$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sagar Kale, Sumedh Tirodkar. 2017-02-08. Maximum Matching in Two, Three, and a Few More Passes Over Graph Streams. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.02559

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗