SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1703.06772

Results from a 2016 Pilot Survey on Math Post-docs

Abstract

A pilot survey was sent to chairs of 14 doctoral math departments asking for three types of data: (1) category on job-placements for research post-docs leaving their department in three recent years; (2) category of jobs from which their new faculty hires came in two recent years and two years a decade earlier; and (3) preparation for future careers offered by their department to their research post-docs. Eleven departments submitted data on post-docs. Of the 162 departing post-docs for whom data was supplied, 25% obtained tenure-track jobs in doctoral departments; 22% took another post-doc; and 18% were reported as "unknown/other". The remaining 35% were evenly divided among tenure-track in non-doctoral departments, full-time non-tenure-track, academic outside the US, and business-industry-government. Eight departments gave complete responses to (2): From the early 2000's to the early 2010's tenure track hiring increased by about 35% (from 18 to 25). The changes across this period as strikingly larger for other ranks: 233%(from 21 to 70) for research post-docs and 211% (from 18 to 56)full-time non-tenure-track doctoral teaching faculty. In section (3), all departments reported observing post-docs' teaching and providing feedback. However, relatively few provided explicit preparation for teaching or guidance for communicating with audiences other than research specialists.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Amy Cohen. 2017-03-16. Results from a 2016 Pilot Survey on Math Post-docs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.06772

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO