Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1703.07247

On the Tree Augmentation Problem

Zeev Nutov
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the Tree Augmentation problem we are given a tree $T=(V,F)$ and a set $E \subseteq V \times V$ of edges with positive integer costs $\{c_e:e \in E\}$. The goal is to augment $T$ by a minimum cost edge set $J \subseteq E$ such that $T \cup J$ is $2$-edge-connected. We obtain the following results. Recently, Adjiashvili [SODA 17] introduced a novel LP for the problem and used it to break the $2$-approximation barrier for instances when the maximum cost $M$ of an edge in $E$ is bounded by a constant; his algorithm computes a $1.96418+\epsilon$ approximate solution in time $n^{{(M/\epsilon^2)}^{O(1)}}$. Using a simpler LP, we achieve ratio $\frac{12}{7}+\epsilon$ in time $2^{O(M/\epsilon^2)} poly(n)$.This gives ratio better than $2$ for logarithmic costs, and not only for constant costs. One of the oldest open questions for the problem is whether for unit costs (when $M=1$) the standard LP-relaxation, so called Cut-LP, has integrality gap less than $2$. We resolve this open question by proving that for unit costs the integrality gap of the Cut-LP is at most $28/15=2-2/15$. In addition, we will prove that another natural LP-relaxation, that is much simpler than the ones in previous work, has integrality gap at most $7/4$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zeev Nutov. 2017-03-21. On the Tree Augmentation Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.07247

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗