arXiv · 1703.08719
Reexamination of Tolman's law and the Gibbs adsorption equation for curved interfaces
Abstract
In manuscript arXiv:1703.08719 [cond-mat.soft], it was claimed that the well-known deduction of Tolman's law is not rigorous, since Tolman's argument implies that two different definitions of the surface tension, called $\gamma$ and $\bar\gamma$ in the manuscript, coincide. This claim is retracted as it can be shown by free-energy minimization that $\gamma = \bar\gamma$ indeed holds for the Laplace radius. Joachim Gro\ss, Philipp Rehner, Carlos Vega, \O{}ivind Wilhelmsen, and the anonymous reviewers of The Journal of Chemical Physics contributed to finding the mistake in the manuscript.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Martin Thomas Horsch, Stefan Becker, Michaela Heier, Jayant Kumar Singh, Felix Diewald, Ralf Müller, George Jackson, Jadran Vrabec, Hans Hasse. 2017-03-25. Reexamination of Tolman's law and the Gibbs adsorption equation for curved interfaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.08719
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.