Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1704.02054

Optimal Las Vegas Locality Sensitive Data Structures

Thomas Dybdahl Ahle
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We show that approximate similarity (near neighbour) search can be solved in high dimensions with performance matching state of the art (data independent) Locality Sensitive Hashing, but with a guarantee of no false negatives. Specifically, we give two data structures for common problems. For $c$-approximate near neighbour in Hamming space we get query time $dn^{1/c+o(1)}$ and space $dn^{1+1/c+o(1)}$ matching that of \cite{indyk1998approximate} and answering a long standing open question from~\cite{indyk2000dimensionality} and~\cite{pagh2016locality} in the affirmative. By means of a new deterministic reduction from $\ell_1$ to Hamming we also solve $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ with query time $d^2n^{1/c+o(1)}$ and space $d^2 n^{1+1/c+o(1)}$. For $(s_1,s_2)$-approximate Jaccard similarity we get query time $dn^{\rho+o(1)}$ and space $dn^{1+\rho+o(1)}$, $\rho=\log\frac{1+s_1}{2s_1}\big/\log\frac{1+s_2}{2s_2}$, when sets have equal size, matching the performance of~\cite{tobias2016}. The algorithms are based on space partitions, as with classic LSH, but we construct these using a combination of brute force, tensoring, perfect hashing and splitter functions \`a la~\cite{naor1995splitters}. We also show a new dimensionality reduction lemma with 1-sided error.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Thomas Dybdahl Ahle. 2017-04-06. Optimal Las Vegas Locality Sensitive Data Structures. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02054

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗