arXiv · 1704.02172
Reply to L.Vaidman's comment on "Asking photons where they have been in plain language"
Abstract
Vaidman's analysis of the photon's past is based on incorrect interpretation of quantum probability amplitudes. The confusion stems from his original work [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{60}, 1351 (1988)], which missed the connection between the amplitudes and the "weak values" introduced therein.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
D. Sokolovski. 2017-04-07. Reply to L.Vaidman's comment on "Asking photons where they have been in plain language". https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02172
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.