SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1704.05232

On the k-Means/Median Cost Function

Abstract

In this work, we study the $k$-means cost function. Given a dataset $X \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ and an integer $k$, the goal of the Euclidean $k$-means problem is to find a set of $k$ centers $C \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ such that $\Phi(C, X) \equiv \sum_{x \in X} \min_{c \in C} ||x - c||^2$ is minimized. Let $\Delta(X,k) \equiv \min_{C \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d} \Phi(C, X)$ denote the cost of the optimal $k$-means solution. For any dataset $X$, $\Delta(X,k)$ decreases as $k$ increases. In this work, we try to understand this behaviour more precisely. For any dataset $X \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$, integer $k \geq 1$, and a precision parameter $\varepsilon > 0$, let $L(X, k, \varepsilon)$ denote the smallest integer such that $\Delta(X, L(X, k, \varepsilon)) \leq \varepsilon \cdot \Delta(X,k)$. We show upper and lower bounds on this quantity. Our techniques generalize for the metric $k$-median problem in arbitrary metric spaces and we give bounds in terms of the doubling dimension of the metric. Finally, we observe that for any dataset $X$, we can compute a set $S$ of size $O \left(L(X, k, \varepsilon/c) \right)$ using $D^2$-sampling such that $\Phi(S,X) \leq \varepsilon \cdot \Delta(X,k)$ for some fixed constant $c$. We also discuss some applications of our bounds.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Anup Bhattacharya, Yoav Freund, Ragesh Jaiswal. 2017-04-18. On the k-Means/Median Cost Function. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05232

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS