SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1704.07351

Metropolis-Hastings Algorithms for Estimating Betweenness Centrality in Large Networks

Abstract

Betweenness centrality is an important index widely used in different domains such as social networks, traffic networks and the world wide web. However, even for mid-size networks that have only a few hundreds thousands vertices, it is computationally expensive to compute exact betweenness scores. Therefore in recent years, several approximate algorithms have been developed. In this paper, first given a network $G$ and a vertex $r \in V(G)$, we propose a Metropolis-Hastings MCMC algorithm that samples from the space $V(G)$ and estimates betweenness score of $r$. The stationary distribution of our MCMC sampler is the optimal sampling proposed for betweenness centrality estimation. We show that our MCMC sampler provides an $(\epsilon,\delta)$-approximation, where the number of required samples depends on the position of $r$ in $G$ and in many cases, it is a constant. Then, given a network $G$ and a set $R \subset V(G)$, we present a Metropolis-Hastings MCMC sampler that samples from the joint space $R$ and $V(G)$ and estimates relative betweenness scores of the vertices in $R$. We show that for any pair $r_i, r_j \in R$, the ratio of the expected values of the estimated relative betweenness scores of $r_i$ and $r_j$ respect to each other is equal to the ratio of their betweenness scores. We also show that our joint-space MCMC sampler provides an $(\epsilon,\delta)$-approximation of the relative betweenness score of $r_i$ respect to $r_j$, where the number of required samples depends on the position of $r_j$ in $G$ and in many cases, it is a constant.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mostafa Haghir Chehreghani, Talel Abdessalem, and Albert Bifet. 2017-04-24. Metropolis-Hastings Algorithms for Estimating Betweenness Centrality in Large Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.07351

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS