SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1704.08468

Linear-Size Hopsets with Small Hopbound, and Distributed Routing with Low Memory

Abstract

For a positive parameter $\beta$, the $\beta$-bounded distance between a pair of vertices $u,v$ in a weighted undirected graph $G = (V,E,\omega)$ is the length of the shortest $u-v$ path in $G$ with at most $\beta$ edges, aka {\em hops}. For $\beta$ as above and $\epsilon>0$, a {\em $(\beta,\epsilon)$-hopset} of $G = (V,E,\omega)$ is a graph $G' =(V,H,\omega_H)$ on the same vertex set, such that all distances in $G$ are $(1+\epsilon)$-approximated by $\beta$-bounded distances in $G\cup G'$. Hopsets are a fundamental graph-theoretic and graph-algorithmic construct, and they are widely used for distance-related problems in a variety of computational settings. Currently existing constructions of hopsets produce hopsets either with $\Omega(n \log n)$ edges, or with a hopbound $n^{\Omega(1)}$. In this paper we devise a construction of {\em linear-size} hopsets with hopbound $(\log n)^{\log^{(3)}n+O(1)}$. This improves the previous bound almost exponentially. We also devise efficient implementations of our construction in PRAM and distributed settings. The only existing PRAM algorithm \cite{EN16} for computing hopsets with a constant (i.e., independent of $n$) hopbound requires $n^{\Omega(1)}$ time. We devise a PRAM algorithm with polylogarithmic running time for computing hopsets with a constant hopbound, i.e., our running time is exponentially better than the previous one. Moreover, these hopsets are also significantly sparser than their counterparts from \cite{EN16}. We use our hopsets to devise a distributed routing scheme that exhibits near-optimal tradeoff between individual memory requirement $\tilde{O}(n^{1/k})$ of vertices throughout preprocessing and routing phases of the algorithm, and stretch $O(k)$, along with a near-optimal construction time $\approx D + n^{1/2 + 1/k}$, where $D$ is the hop-diameter of the input graph.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Elkin, Ofer Neiman. 2017-04-27. Linear-Size Hopsets with Small Hopbound, and Distributed Routing with Low Memory. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.08468

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS