SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1706.01623

Approximation Algorithms for Minimizing Maximum Sensor Movement for Line Barrier Coverage in the Plane

Abstract

Given a line barrier and a set of mobile sensors distributed in the plane, the Minimizing Maximum Sensor Movement problem (MMSM) for \textcolor{black}{line barrier coverage} is to compute relocation positions for the sensors in the plane such that the barrier is entirely covered by the monitoring area of the sensors while the maximum relocation movement (distance) is minimized. Its weaker version, decision MMSM is to determine whether the barrier can be covered by the sensors within a given relocation distance bound $D\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}$. This paper presents three approximation algorithms for decision MMSM. The first is a simple greedy approach, which runs in time $O(n\log n)$ and achieves a maximum movement $D^{*}+2r_{max}$, where $n$ is the number of the sensors, $D^{*}$ is the maximum movement of an optimal solution and $r_{max}$ is the maximum radii of the sensors. The second and the third algorithms improve the maximum movement to $D^{*}+r_{max}$ , running in time $O(n^{7}L)$ and $O(R^{2}\sqrt{\frac{M}{\log R}})$ by applying linear programming (LP) rounding and maximal matching tchniques respecitvely, where $R=\sum2r_{i}$, which is $O(n)$ in practical scenarios of uniform sensing radius for all sensors, and $M\leq n\max r_{i}$. Applying the above algorithms for $O(\log(d_{max}))$ time in binary search immediately yields solutions to MMSM with the same performance guarantee. In addition, we also give a factor-2 approximation algorithm which can be used to improve the performance of the first three algorithms when $r_{max}>D^{*}$. As shown in \cite{dobrev2015complexity}, the 2-D MMSM problem admits no FPTAS as it is strongly NP-complete, so our algorithms arguably achieve the best possible ratio.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Longkun Guo, Hong Shen. 2017-06-06. Approximation Algorithms for Minimizing Maximum Sensor Movement for Line Barrier Coverage in the Plane. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01623

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS