arXiv · 1706.02168
Testing Ambiguity and Machina Preferences Within a Quantum-theoretic Framework for Decision-making
Abstract
The Machina thought experiments pose to major non-expected utility models challenges that are similar to those posed by the Ellsberg thought experiments to subjective expected utility theory (SEUT). We test human choices in the `Ellsberg three-color example', confirming typical ambiguity aversion patterns, and the `Machina 50/51 and reflection examples', partially confirming the preferences hypothesized by Machina. Then, we show that a quantum-theoretic framework for decision-making under uncertainty recently elaborated by some of us allows faithful modeling of all data on the Ellsberg and Machina paradox situations. In the quantum-theoretic framework subjective probabilities are represented by quantum probabilities, while quantum state transformations enable representations of ambiguity aversion and subjective attitudes toward it.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Diederik Aerts, Suzette Geriente, Catarina Moreira, Sandro Sozzo. 2017-06-06. Testing Ambiguity and Machina Preferences Within a Quantum-theoretic Framework for Decision-making. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.02168
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.