Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1706.04105

Algebraic Analysis and Mathematical Physics

Jean-Francois Pommaret
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper aims to revisit the mathematical foundations of both General Relativity and Electromagnetism after one century, in the light of the formal theory of systems of partial differential equations and Lie pseudogroups (D.C. Spencer, 1970) or Algebraic Analysis, namely a mixture of differential geometry and homological algebra (M. Kashiwara, 1970). Among the new results obtained, we may quote: 1) In dimension 4 only, the 9 Bianchi identities that must be satisfied by the 10 components of the Weyl tensor are described by a second order operator and have thus nothing to do with the 20 first order Bianchi identities for the 20 components of the Riemann tensor. This result, not known after one century, has been recently confirmed by A. Quadrat (INRIA) using new computer algebra packages. 2) The Ricci tensor R is a section of the Ricci bundle of symmetric covariant 2-tensors which is the kernel of the canonical projection of the Riemann bundle onto the Weyl bundle, induced by the canonical inclusion of the classical Killing system (Poincare group) into the conformal Killing system (Conformal group). It has only to do with the second order jets (elations) of the conformal Killing system because any 1-form with value in the bundle of elations can be decomposed in the direct sum (R,F) where the electromagnetic field F is a section of the vector bundle of skewsymmetric covariant 2-tensors. It follows therefore that electromagnetism and gravitation have only to do with second order jets. 3) The 10 linearized second order Einstein equations are parametrizing the 4 first order Cauchy stress equations but cannot be parametrized themselves. As a byproduct of this negative result, these 4 Cauchy stress equations have nothing to do with the 4 divergence-type equations usually obtained from the 20 Bianchi identities by contraction of indices.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jean-Francois Pommaret. 2017-06-13. Algebraic Analysis and Mathematical Physics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.04105

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗