SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1707.00256

Computing from projections of random points: a dense hierarchy of subideals of the $K$-trivial degrees

Abstract

We study the sets that are computable from both halves of some (Martin-L\"of) random sequence, which we call \emph{$1/2$-bases}. We show that the collection of such sets forms an ideal in the Turing degrees that is generated by its c.e.\ elements. It is a proper subideal of the $K$-trivial sets. We characterise $1/2$-bases as the sets computable from both halves of Chaitin's $\Omega$, and as the sets that obey the cost function $\mathbf c(x,s) = \sqrt{\Omega_s - \Omega_x}$. Generalising these results yields a dense hierarchy of subideals in the $K$-trivial degrees: For $k< n$, let $B_{k/n}$ be the collection of sets that are below any $k$ out of $n$ columns of some random sequence. As before, this is an ideal generated by its c.e.\ elements and the random sequence in the definition can always be taken to be $\Omega$. Furthermore, the corresponding cost function characterisation reveals that $B_{k/n}$ is independent of the particular representation of the rational $k/n$, and that $B_p$ is properly contained in $B_q$ for rational numbers $p< q$. These results are proved using a generalisation of the Loomis--Whitney inequality, which bounds the measure of an open set in terms of the measures of its projections. The generality allows us to analyse arbitrary families of orthogonal projections. As it turns out, these do not give us new subideals of the $K$-trivial sets, we can calculate from the family which $B_p$ it characterises. We finish by showing that the the union of $B_p$ for $p<1$ is the collection of sets which are robustly computable from a random, a class previously studied by Hirschfeldt, Jockusch, Kuyper, and Schupp.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Noam Greenberg, Joseph S. Miller, Andre Nies. 2017-07-02. Computing from projections of random points: a dense hierarchy of subideals of the $K$-trivial degrees. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219061319500144

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO