SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1709.04965

Ibn al-\v{S}\=atir, L'ach\`evement de l'enqu\^ete et la correction des fondements / Kit\=ab nih\=aya al-s\=ul f\=i tash\=ih al-'us\=ul. \'Edition, traduction et commentaire math\'ematique par Erwan Pench\`evre

Abstract

This book is a critical edition of a treatise of astronomy by the Syrian scholar Ibn al-\v{S}\=atir (1304-1375). The Arabic text has been established on the basis of several manuscript copies, and it has been translated into French; a bilingual index is also provided. This treatise is one of the latest and one of the most elaborate medieval work on theoretical astronomy; it is famous today for having provided the first viable lunar model in terms of the distance Moon-Earth. Although demonstrations have been consigned to another manuscript which is now lost, we reconstruct the physical models in our mathematical commentary, and we attempt at a better historical understanding of the nascent concepts of space transformations, solid reference frames, trajectory, etc. Predictions of the models are to be compared to observations and to other contemporary models, as well as theoretical premises; in turn, when records of observations are missing, those have to be recalculated by modern means. Part of our commentary is devoted to the latitudinal movement of the five planets: Ibn al-\v{S}\=atir's work on this problem belongs to a tradition initiated by Ibn al-Haytham three centuries before. Ibn al-\v{S}\=atir addresses a clever criticism to the work of his predecessor Nas\=ir al-D\=in al-T\=us\=i on this problem, thus revealing a better understanding of affine rotations in space. Many other criticisms by Ibn al-\v{S}\=atir, especially to the astronomers working at Mar\=a\.ga during the 13th century, also contribute to a better knowledge of their own work.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Erwan Penchèvre. 2017-09-14. Ibn al-\v{S}\=atir, L'ach\`evement de l'enqu\^ete et la correction des fondements / Kit\=ab nih\=aya al-s\=ul f\=i tash\=ih al-'us\=ul. \'Edition, traduction et commentaire math\'ematique par Erwan Pench\`evre. https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.04965

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO