SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1709.08178

Ideal weak QN-spaces

Abstract

This paper is devoted to studies of IwQN-spaces and some of their cardinal characteristics. Recently, \v{S}upina proved that I is not a weak P-ideal if and only if any topological space is an IQN-space. Moreover, under $\mathfrak{p}=\mathfrak{c}$ he constructed a maximal ideal I (which is not a weak P-ideal) for which the notions of IQN-space and QN-space do not coincide. In this paper we show that, consistently, there is an ideal I (which is not a weak P-ideal) for which the notions of IwQN-space and wQN-space do not coincide. We also prove that for this ideal the ideal version of Scheepers Conjecture does not hold (this is the first known example of such weak P-ideal). We obtain a strictly combinatorial characterization of ${\tt non}(\text{IwQN-space})$ similar to the one given by \v{S}upina in the case of ${\tt non}(\text{IQN-space})$. We calculate ${\tt non}(\text{IQN-space})$ and ${\tt non}(\text{IwQN-space})$ for some weak P-ideals. Namely, we show that $\mathfrak{b}\leq{\tt non}(\text{IQN-space})\leq{\tt non}(\text{IwQN-space})\leq\mathfrak{d}$ for every weak P-ideal I and that ${\tt non}(\text{IQN-space})={\tt non}(\text{IwQN-space})=\mathfrak{b}$ for every $\mathtt{F_\sigma}$ ideal I as well as for every analytic P-ideal I generated by an unbounded submeasure (this establishes some new bounds for $\mathfrak{b}(I,I,Fin)$). As a consequence, we obtain some bounds for ${\tt add}(\text{IQN-space})$. In particular, we get ${\tt add}(\text{IQN-space})=\mathfrak{b}$ for analytic P-ideals I generated by an unbounded submeasure. By a result of Bukovsk\'y, Das and \v{S}upina it is known that in the case of tall ideals I the notions of IQN-space (IwQN-space) and QN-space (wQN-space) cannot be distinguished. We prove that if I is a tall ideal and X is a topological space of cardinality less than ${\tt cov^*}(I)$, then X is an IwQN-space if and only if it is a wQN-space.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Adam Kwela. 2017-09-24. Ideal weak QN-spaces. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2018.03.007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN