arXiv · 1709.09521
Arc representations
Abstract
This paper was inspired by four articles: surface cluster algebras studied by Fomin-Shapiro-Thurston \cite{fst}, the mutation theory of quivers with potentials initiated by Derksen-Weyman-Zelevinsky \cite{dwz}, string modules associated to arcs on unpunctured surfaces by Assem-Br$\ddot{u}$stle-Charbonneau-Plamondon \cite{acbp} and Quivers with potentials associated to triangulated surfaces, part II: Arc representations by Labardini-Fragoso. \cite{lf2}. For a surface with marked points ($Σ,M$) Labardini-Fragoso associated a quiver with potential $(Q(τ),S(τ))$ then for an ideal triangulation of ($Σ,M$) and an ideal arc Labardini-Fragoso defined an arc representation of $(Q(τ),S(τ))$. This paper focuses on extent the definition of arc representation to a more general context by considering a tagged triangulation and a tagged arc. We associate in an explicit way a representation of the quiver with potential constructed Labardini-Fragoso and prove that the Jacobian relations are met.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Salomón Domínguez. 2017-09-25. Arc representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.09521
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.