Solving Packing and Covering LPs in $\tilde{O}(\frac{1}{\epsilon^2})$ Distributed Iterations with a Single Algorithm and Simpler Analysis

Jelena Diakonikolas; Lorenzo Orecchia

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1710.09002

Solving Packing and Covering LPs in $\tilde{O}(\frac{1}{\epsilon^2})$ Distributed Iterations with a Single Algorithm and Simpler Analysis

Jelena Diakonikolas·Lorenzo Orecchia

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Packing and covering linear programs belong to the narrow class of linear programs that are efficiently solvable in parallel and distributed models of computation, yet are a powerful modeling tool for a wide range of fundamental problems in theoretical computer science, operations research, and many other areas. Following recent progress in obtaining faster distributed and parallel algorithms for packing and covering linear programs, we present a simple algorithm whose iteration count matches the best known $\tilde{O}(\frac{1}{\epsilon^2})$ for this class of problems. The algorithm is similar to the algorithm of [Allen-Zhu and Orecchia, 2015], it can be interpreted as Nesterov's dual averaging, and it constructs approximate solutions to both primal (packing) and dual (covering) problems. However, the analysis relies on the construction of an approximate optimality gap and a primal-dual view, leading to a more intuitive interpretation. Moreover, our analysis suggests that all existing algorithms for solving packing and covering linear programs in parallel/distributed models of computation are, in fact, unaccelerated, and raises the question of designing accelerated algorithms for this class of problems.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Jelena Diakonikolas, Lorenzo Orecchia. 2017-10-24. Solving Packing and Covering LPs in $\tilde{O}(\frac{1}{\epsilon^2})$ Distributed Iterations with a Single Algorithm and Simpler Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗