SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1710.09961

Edge-Based Wedge Sampling to Estimate Triangle Counts in Very Large Graphs

Abstract

The number of triangles in a graph is useful to deduce a plethora of important features of the network that the graph is modeling. However, finding the exact value of this number is computationally expensive. Hence, a number of approximation algorithms based on random sampling of edges, or wedges (adjacent edge pairs) have been proposed for estimating this value. We argue that for large sparse graphs with power-law degree distribution, random edge sampling requires sampling large number of edges before providing enough information for accurate estimation, and existing wedge sampling methods lead to biased samplings, which in turn lead to less accurate estimations. In this paper, we propose a hybrid algorithm between edge and wedge sampling that addresses the deficiencies of both approaches. We start with uniform edge sampling and then extend each selected edge to form a wedge that is more informative for estimating the overall triangle count. The core estimate we make is the number of triangles each sampled edge in the first phase participates in. This approach provides accurate approximations with very small sampling ratios, outperforming the state-of-the-art up to 8 times in sample size while providing estimations with 95% confidence.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Duru Türkoğlu, Ata Turk. 2017-10-27. Edge-Based Wedge Sampling to Estimate Triangle Counts in Very Large Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09961

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS