Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1712.01774

Optimal Fast Johnson-Lindenstrauss Embeddings for Large Data Sets

Stefan Bamberger·Felix Krahmer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Johnson-Lindenstrauss embeddings are widely used to reduce the dimension and thus the processing time of data. To reduce the total complexity, also fast algorithms for applying these embeddings are necessary. To date, such fast algorithms are only available either for a non-optimal embedding dimension or up to a certain threshold on the number of data points. We address a variant of this problem where one aims to simultaneously embed larger subsets of the data set. Our method follows an approach by Nelson: A subsampled Hadamard transform maps points into a space of lower, but not optimal dimension. Subsequently, a random matrix with independent entries projects to an optimal embedding dimension. For subsets whose size scales at least polynomially in the ambient dimension, the complexity of this method comes close to the number of operations just to read the data under mild assumptions on the size of the data set that are considerably less restrictive than in previous works. We also prove a lower bound showing that subsampled Hadamard matrices alone cannot reach an optimal embedding dimension. Hence, the second embedding cannot be omitted.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stefan Bamberger, Felix Krahmer. 2017-12-05. Optimal Fast Johnson-Lindenstrauss Embeddings for Large Data Sets. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01774

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗