SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1802.06686

On Local Distributed Sampling and Counting

Abstract

In classic distributed graph problems, each instance on a graph specifies a space of feasible solutions (e.g. all proper ($\Delta+1$)-list-colorings of the graph), and the task of distributed algorithm is to construct a feasible solution using local information. We study distributed sampling and counting problems, in which each instance specifies a joint distribution of feasible solutions. The task of distributed algorithm is to sample from this joint distribution, or to locally measure the volume of the probability space via the marginal probabilities. The latter task is also known as inference, which is a local counterpart of counting. For self-reducible classes of instances, the following equivalences are established in the LOCAL model up to polylogarithmic factors: $\bullet$ For all joint distributions, approximate inference and approximate sampling are computationally equivalent. $\bullet$ For all joint distributions defined by local constraints, exact sampling is reducible to either one of the above tasks. $\bullet$ If further, sequentially constructing a feasible solution is trivial locally, then all above tasks are easy if and only if the joint distribution exhibits strong spatial mixing. Combining with the state of the arts of strong spatial mixing, we obtain efficient sampling algorithms in the LOCAL model for various important sampling problems, including: an $O(\sqrt{\Delta}\log^3n)$-round algorithm for exact sampling matchings in graphs with maximum degree $\Delta$, and an $O(\log^3n)$-round algorithm for sampling according to the hardcore model (weighted independent sets) in the uniqueness regime, which along with the $\Omega(\mathrm{diam})$ lower bound in arXiv:1702.00142 for sampling according to the hardcore model in the non-uniqueness regime, gives the first computational phase transition for distributed sampling.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Weiming Feng, Yitong Yin. 2018-02-19. On Local Distributed Sampling and Counting. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06686

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS