SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1802.09104

A New Algorithm for Finding Closest Pair of Vectors

Abstract

Given $n$ vectors $x_0, x_1, \ldots, x_{n-1}$ in $\{0,1\}^{m}$, how to find two vectors whose pairwise Hamming distance is minimum? This problem is known as the \emph{Closest Pair Problem}. If these vectors are generated uniformly at random except two of them are correlated with Pearson-correlation coefficient $\rho$, then the problem is called the \emph{Light Bulb Problem}. In this work, we propose a novel coding-based scheme for the Closest Pair Problem. We design both randomized and deterministic algorithms, which achieve the best-known running time when the length of input vectors $m$ is small and the minimum distance is very small compared to $m$. Specifically, the running time of our randomized algorithm is $O(n\log^{2}n\cdot 2^{c m} \cdot \mathrm{poly}(m))$ and the running time of our deterministic algorithm is $O(n\log{n}\cdot 2^{c' m} \cdot \mathrm{poly}(m))$, where $c$ and $c'$ are constants depending only on the (relative) distance of the closest pair. When applied to the Light Bulb Problem, our result yields state-of-the-art deterministic running time when the Pearson-correlation coefficient $\rho$ is very large. Specifically, when $\rho \geq 0.9933$, our deterministic algorithm runs faster than the previously best deterministic algorithm (Alman, SOSA 2019).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ning Xie, Shuai Xu, Yekun Xu. 2018-02-25. A New Algorithm for Finding Closest Pair of Vectors. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.09104

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS