SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1802.09249

Joins and meets in the structure of Ceers

Abstract

We study computably enumerable equivalence relations (abbreviated as ceers) under computable reducibility, and we investigate the resulting degree structure Ceers, which is a poset with a smallest and a greatest element. We point out a partition of the ceers into three classes: the finite ceers, the light ceers, and the dark ceers. These classes yield a partition of the degree structure as well, and in the language of posets the corresponding classes of degrees are first order definable within Ceers. There is no least, no maximal, no greatest dark degree, but there are infinitely many minimal dark degrees. We study joins and meets in Ceers, addressing the cases when two incomparable degrees of ceers X,Y have or do not have join or meet according to where X,Y are located in the classes of the aforementioned partition: in particular no pair of dark ceers has join, and no pair in which at least one ceer is dark has meet. We also exhibit examples of ceers X,Y having join which coincides with their uniform join, but also examples when their join is strictly less than the uniform join. We study join-irreducibility and meet-irreducibility. In particular we characterize the property of being meet-irreducible for a ceer E, by showing that it coincides with the property of E being self-full, i.e. every reducibility from E to itself is in fact surjective on its equivalence classes (this property properly extends darkness). We then study the quotient structure obtained by dividing the poset Ceers by the degrees of the finite ceers, and study joins and meets in this quotient structure. We look at automorphisms of Ceers, and show that there are continuum many automorphisms fixing the dark ceers, and continuum many automorphisms fixing the light ceers. Finally, we compute the complexity of the index sets of the classes of ceers studied in the paper.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Uri Andrews, Andrea Sorbi. 2018-02-26. Joins and meets in the structure of Ceers. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.09249

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO