SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1804.02530

$\varepsilon$-Coresets for Clustering (with Outliers) in Doubling Metrics

Abstract

We study the problem of constructing $\varepsilon$-coresets for the $(k, z)$-clustering problem in a doubling metric $M(X, d)$. An $\varepsilon$-coreset is a weighted subset $S\subseteq X$ with weight function $w : S \rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$, such that for any $k$-subset $C \in [X]^k$, it holds that $\sum_{x \in S}{w(x) \cdot d^z(x, C)} \in (1 \pm \varepsilon) \cdot \sum_{x \in X}{d^z(x, C)}$. We present an efficient algorithm that constructs an $\varepsilon$-coreset for the $(k, z)$-clustering problem in $M(X, d)$, where the size of the coreset only depends on the parameters $k, z, \varepsilon$ and the doubling dimension $\mathsf{ddim}(M)$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first efficient $\varepsilon$-coreset construction of size independent of $|X|$ for general clustering problems in doubling metrics. To this end, we establish the first relation between the doubling dimension of $M(X, d)$ and the shattering dimension (or VC-dimension) of the range space induced by the distance $d$. Such a relation was not known before, since one can easily construct instances in which neither one can be bounded by (some function of) the other. Surprisingly, we show that if we allow a small $(1\pm\epsilon)$-distortion of the distance function $d$, and consider the notion of $\tau$-error probabilistic shattering dimension, we can prove an upper bound of $O( \mathsf{ddim}(M)\cdot \log(1/\varepsilon) +\log\log{\frac{1}{\tau}} )$ for the probabilistic shattering dimension for even weighted doubling metrics. We believe this new relation is of independent interest and may find other applications. We also study the robust coresets and centroid sets in doubling metrics. Our robust coreset construction leads to new results in clustering and property testing, and the centroid sets can be used to accelerate the local search algorithms for clustering problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lingxiao Huang, Shaofeng H. -C. Jiang, Jian Li, Xuan Wu. 2018-04-07. $\varepsilon$-Coresets for Clustering (with Outliers) in Doubling Metrics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02530

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS