A Note on Switching Conditions for the Generalized Logical Connectives in Multiplicative Linear Logic

Yuki Nishimuta; Mitsuhiro Okada

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1804.02540

A Note on Switching Conditions for the Generalized Logical Connectives in Multiplicative Linear Logic

Yuki Nishimuta·Mitsuhiro Okada

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Danos and Regnier (1989) introduced the par-switching condition for multiplicative proof-structures and simplified the sequentialization theorem of Girard (1987) by means of par-switching. Danos and Regnier (1989) also generalized the par-switching to a switching for n-ary connectives (hereafter called an n-ary switching) and showed that the "expansion" property holds, namely that any "excluded-middle" formula admits a correct proof-net in the sense of their n-ary switching. They added a remark that the sequentialization theorem does not hold with their switching. Their definition of switching for n-ary connectives is a natural generalization of the original switching for the binary connectives. However, there are many other possible definitions of switching for n-ary connectives. We give an alternative and "natural" definition of n-ary switching, and we show that the proof of sequentialization theorem by Olivier Laurent with the par-switching works for our n-ary switching; Consequently, the sequentialization theorem holds for our n-ary switching. On the other hand, we remark that the "expansion" property no longer holds under our switching anymore. We point out that no definition of n-ary switching satisfies both the sequentialization theorem and the "expansion" property at the same time except for the purely tensor-based (or purely par-based) connectives.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Yuki Nishimuta, Mitsuhiro Okada. 2018-04-07. A Note on Switching Conditions for the Generalized Logical Connectives in Multiplicative Linear Logic. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02540

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗