SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1804.02785

Maximizing the Number of Spanning Trees in a Connected Graph

Abstract

We study the problem of maximizing the number of spanning trees in a connected graph by adding at most $k$ edges from a given candidate edge set. We give both algorithmic and hardness results for this problem: - We give a greedy algorithm that, using submodularity, obtains an approximation ratio of $(1 - 1/e - \epsilon)$ in the exponent of the number of spanning trees for any $\epsilon > 0$ in time $\tilde{O}(m \epsilon^{-1} + (n + q) \epsilon^{-3})$, where $m$ and $q$ is the number of edges in the original graph and the candidate edge set, respectively. Our running time is optimal with respect to the input size up to logarithmic factors, and substantially improves upon the $O(n^3)$ running time of the previous proposed greedy algorithm with approximation ratio $(1 - 1/e)$ in the exponent. Notably, the independence of our running time of $k$ is novel, comparing to conventional top-$k$ selections on graphs that usually run in $\Omega(mk)$ time. A key ingredient of our greedy algorithm is a routine for maintaining effective resistances under edge additions in an online-offline hybrid setting. - We show the exponential inapproximability of this problem by proving that there exists a constant $c > 0$ such that it is NP-hard to approximate the optimum number of spanning trees in the exponent within $(1 - c)$. This inapproximability result follows from a reduction from the minimum path cover in undirected graphs, whose hardness again follows from the constant inapproximability of the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) with distances 1 and 2. Thus, the approximation ratio of our algorithm is also optimal up to a constant factor in the exponent. To our knowledge, this is the first hardness of approximation result for maximizing the number of spanning trees in a graph, or equivalently, by Kirchhoff's matrix-tree theorem, maximizing the determinant of an SDDM matrix.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Huan Li, Stacy Patterson, Yuhao Yi, Zhongzhi Zhang. 2018-04-09. Maximizing the Number of Spanning Trees in a Connected Graph. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02785

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS