SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1804.03604

Optimal Document Exchange and New Codes for Insertions and Deletions

Abstract

We give the first communication-optimal document exchange protocol. For any $n$ and $k < n$ our randomized scheme takes any $n$-bit file $F$ and computes a $\Theta(k \log \frac{n}{k})$-bit summary from which one can reconstruct $F$, with high probability, given a related file $F'$ with edit distance $ED(F,F') \leq k$. The size of our summary is information-theoretically order optimal for all values of $k$, giving a randomized solution to a longstanding open question of [Orlitsky; FOCS'91]. It also is the first non-trivial solution for the interesting setting where a small constant fraction of symbols have been edited, producing an optimal summary of size $O(H(\delta)n)$ for $k=\delta n$. This concludes a long series of better-and-better protocols which produce larger summaries for sub-linear values of $k$ and sub-polynomial failure probabilities. In particular, the recent break-through of [Belazzougui, Zhang; FOCS'16] assumes that $k < n^\epsilon$, produces a summary of size $O(k\log^2 k + k\log n)$, and succeeds with probability $1-(k \log n)^{-O(1)}$. We also give an efficient derandomized document exchange protocol with summary size $O(k \log^2 \frac{n}{k})$. This improves, for any $k$, over a deterministic document exchange protocol by Belazzougui with summary size $O(k^2 + k \log^2 n)$. Our deterministic document exchange directly provides new efficient systematic error correcting codes for insertions and deletions. These (binary) codes correct any $\delta$ fraction of adversarial insertions/deletions while having a rate of $1 - O(\delta \log^2 \frac{1}{\delta})$ and improve over the codes of Guruswami and Li and Haeupler, Shahrasbi and Vitercik which have rate $1 - \Theta\left(\sqrt{\delta} \log^{O(1)} \frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Bernhard Haeupler. 2018-04-10. Optimal Document Exchange and New Codes for Insertions and Deletions. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03604

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS