Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1804.04778

Understanding Community Structure in Layered Neural Networks

Chihiro Watanabe·Kaoru Hiramatsu·Kunio Kashino
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A layered neural network is now one of the most common choices for the prediction of high-dimensional practical data sets, where the relationship between input and output data is complex and cannot be represented well by simple conventional models. Its effectiveness is shown in various tasks, however, the lack of interpretability of the trained result by a layered neural network has limited its application area. In our previous studies, we proposed methods for extracting a simplified global structure of a trained layered neural network by classifying the units into communities according to their connection patterns with adjacent layers. These methods provided us with knowledge about the strength of the relationship between communities from the existence of bundled connections, which are determined by threshold processing of the connection ratio between pairs of communities. However, it has been difficult to understand the role of each community quantitatively by observing the modular structure. We could only know to which sets of the input and output dimensions each community was mainly connected, by tracing the bundled connections from the community to the input and output layers. Another problem is that the finally obtained modular structure is changed greatly depending on the setting of the threshold hyperparameter used for determining bundled connections. In this paper, we propose a new method for interpreting quantitatively the role of each community in inference, by defining the effect of each input dimension on a community, and the effect of a community on each output dimension. We show experimentally that our proposed method can reveal the role of each part of a layered neural network by applying the neural networks to three types of data sets, extracting communities from the trained network, and applying the proposed method to the community structure.

Explore related subjects

stat.MLcs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chihiro Watanabe, Kaoru Hiramatsu, Kunio Kashino. 2018-04-13. Understanding Community Structure in Layered Neural Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.04778

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A Hilbert-Valued Functional Decomposition Framework for Explaining Time-Dependent Outputs

Feature-based explanations quantify features' influence on model predictions, but are primarily designed for scalar outputs. In many applications, however, outputs are functional or multivariate, such as time-dependent trajectories in demand forecasting. Consequently, existing approaches typically explain each output location independently, ignoring dependencies across the output components. We address this limitation by developing a unified framework for feature-based explanations of time-dependent outputs. Specifically, we generalize functional decomposition to Hilbert-valued prediction functions and extend an existing feature-based explanation framework to this setting. Our framework introduces kernel-based output representations that enable time-dependency-aware explanations at multiple levels of temporal granularity, including time-specific, time-resolved, and time-aggregated, while providing a unified view in which existing methods arise as special cases. We validate our framework on synthetic and real-world data, including intraday financial market volatility prediction and energy demand forecasting.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

Risk-Averse Decision Making with Multi-Level Reliability Guarantees

Many applications in engineering, including wireless broadcasting, require designs that provide performance certificates at different target outage levels. This paper studies the problem of maximizing the weighted average of such certificates in the presence of uncertainty about the true system state. The problem is shown to be equivalent to an optimization over nested prediction sets, connecting to the literature on conformal prediction and extending prior art on single-level risk-averse decision making. Furthermore, we derive a dual formulation that decouples optimization across input values. Numerical experiments on a diversity-based wireless transmission system illustrate the cost of enforcing multi-level certificates with a single shared policy and trace the Pareto trade-off between multiple reliability levels.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

A distribution-free certification framework for trustworthy crash-severity prediction

Crash-severity models inform screening, dispatch and site prioritization, yet are deployed without a finite-sample statement of what one prediction means. Off-the-shelf guarantees fail here, because the features that make crash severity distinctive defeat them: the KABCO outcome is ordinal, the recorded label is a field assessment agreeing with medical severity about half the time, erring in a structured way, and deployment crosses jurisdictions and years calibration never saw. We develop a certification layer that wraps any severity model unmodified, with distribution-free guarantees using this structure: contiguous ordinal sets that read as "B or worse"; per-class validity for any pre-declared partition, with an oracle efficiency characterization; transfer of coverage to unobserved true severity through a declared reporting band, with a worst-case sharpness result; a one-sided certificate under deployment shift; and severity-weighted risk control. The guarantees compose with an attributable slack budget. The same analysis bounds what certification can achieve. A certified set's informativeness is governed by a functional of the true law that no base model can evade and that cannot be lower-bounded distribution-free; given a declared misreporting channel identified from record-linkage data, a nonvacuous lower bound on that floor becomes computable. On 5.2 million Texas records across seven base models spanning four decades, the layer attaches identical validity and certifies, on the vulnerable road users, a model-independent floor on set width that no base model beats, separating it from a remainder that stays bounded but distribution-free unidentifiable. The framework is released as an open-source package with theorem-level tests.

stat.ML↗