Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1804.08178

Nearly Linear Time Deterministic Algorithms for Submodular Maximization Under Knapsack Constraint and Beyond

Wenxin Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this work, we study the classic submodular maximization problem under knapsack constraints and beyond. We first present an $(7/16-\varepsilon)$-approximate algorithm for single knapsack constraint, which requires $O(n\cdot\max\{\varepsilon^{-1},\log\log n\})$ queries, and two passes in the streaming setting. This provides improvements in approximation ratio, query complexity and number of passes on the stream. We next show that there exists an $(1/2-\varepsilon)$-approximate deterministic algorithm for constant number of binary packing constraints, which achieves a query complexity of $O_{\varepsilon}(n\cdot\log \log n)$. One salient feature of our deterministic algorithm is, both its approximation ratio and time complexity are independent of the number of constraints. Lastly we present nearly linear time algorithms for the intersection of $p$-system and $d$ knapsack constraint, we achieve approximation ratio of $(1/(p+\frac{7}{4}d+1)-\varepsilon)$ for monotone objective and $(p/(p+1)(2p+\frac{7}{4}d+1)-\varepsilon)$ for non-monotone objective.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Wenxin Li. 2018-04-22. Nearly Linear Time Deterministic Algorithms for Submodular Maximization Under Knapsack Constraint and Beyond. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.08178

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗