SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1804.10056

A connection between tests for absolute convergence of infinite series, or how to be fair

Abstract

The Ratio Test and the Root Test for absolute convergence/divergence of series of numbers $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n$ are frequently discussed and proved independently in Calculus courses. The Root Test is stronger (verifies convergence for more series) than the Ratio Test. This relation inspires introduction of some intermediate strength tests (stronger than the Ratio Test and weaker than the Root Test) that we call Power Mean Tests (they, in particular, include the Arithmetic Mean Test). We show the connection between the Root, the Power Mean and the Ratio Tests. We also note that all these tests are related to the test that we formulate and call Generalized $f$-mean Test (or Kolmogorov-Nagumo-de Finetti mean Test). We provide an example of an infinite series, where the Arithmetic Mean test is the test that should be used for convergence verification, because the Root and the Ratio Tests are not easy to apply. We conclude this work with the statement emphasizing why it is ``fair'' to include the summarizing Corollary 3.1 in our Calculus course.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Victoria Rayskin. 2018-04-25. A connection between tests for absolute convergence of infinite series, or how to be fair. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2024.2393266

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO