SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1805.01505

A Reconstruction, Assessment, Error Analysis and Simulation of a Method for Measuring {\pi} That Could Have Been Used 3000 Years Ago

Abstract

There is little known about the methods used by the ancient Babylonians and Egyptians to arrive at their recorded estimates of the value of Pi. A surprisingly accurate estimate of Pi was recently revealed coded within a verse in the book of 1 Kings, the value of which suggests how it might have been measured. The coded value is 111/106, which is a continued fraction representation of Pi/3. This suggests that the value may have been measured using an iterative measurement of remainders when comparing the two lengths C (circumference of the circle) and 6R (6 times the radius). This article describes a method that could have been used 3000 years ago to make such a measurement, the expected measurement errors, and a computer simulation that assesses the chances of such a method succeeding in obtaining the coded value of 111/106. The result indicate that with the technology available at the time the proposed measurement method would have been possible and would have had about a 75% chance of producing the result 111/106 after a few hundred measurements.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

David Neustadter. 2018-05-03. A Reconstruction, Assessment, Error Analysis and Simulation of a Method for Measuring {\pi} That Could Have Been Used 3000 Years Ago. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.01505

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO