Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1805.01734

Finite-Part Integration of the Generalized Stieltjes Transform and its dominant asymptotic behavior for small values of the parameter. II. Non-integer orders

Christian D. Tica·Eric A. Galapon
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The paper constitutes the second part on the subject of finite part integration of the generalized Stieltjes transform $S_λ[f]=\int_0^{\infty} f(x) (ω+x)^{-λ}\mathrm{d}x$ about $ω= 0$ where now $λ$ is a non-integer positive real number. Divergent integrals with singularities at the origin are induced by writing $(ω+x)^{-λ}$ as a binomial expansion about $ω= 0$ and interchanging the order of operations of integration and summation. The prescription of finite part integration is then implemented by interpreting these divergent integrals as finite part integrals which are rigorously represented as complex contour integrals. The same contour is then used to express $S_λ[f]$ itself as a complex contour integral. This led to the recovery of the terms missed by naive term-wise integration which themselves are finite parts of divergent integrals whose singularity is at the finite upper limit of integration. When the function $f(x)$ has a zero at the origin of order $m=0,1,\dots$ such that $m-λ<0$ the correction terms missed out by naive term by term integration give the dominant contribution to $S_λ[f]$ as $ω\to 0$. Otherwise, the correction term is sub-dominant to the leading convergent terms in the naive term by term integration. We apply these results by obtaining exact and asymptotic representations of the Kummer and Gauss hypergeometric functions by evaluating their known Stieltjes integral representations. We then apply the method of finite part integration to obtain the asymptotic behavior of a generalization of the Stieltjes integral which is relevant in the calculation of the effective index of refraction of a shallow potential well.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.MP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christian D. Tica, Eric A. Galapon. 2018-11-07. Finite-Part Integration of the Generalized Stieltjes Transform and its dominant asymptotic behavior for small values of the parameter. II. Non-integer orders. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5038900

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗