arXiv · 1805.09681
Comparing the PYTHIA Monte Carlo to a two-component (soft + hard) model of hadron production in high-energy p-p collisions
Abstract
The PYTHIA Monte Carlo (PMC), first introduced more than thirty years ago, remains a popular simulation tool both for analysis of $p$-$p$ collision dynamics and for detector design and calibration. The PMC assumes that almost all produced hadrons result from parton-parton scatterings (interactions) described by pQCD (a hard component), and that multiple parton interactions per collision event (MPIs) are a common occurrence. In contrast, a two-component (soft + hard) model (TCM) of high-energy collisions, inferred inductively from a variety of data formats, attributes a majority of final-state hadrons to a soft component (projectile-nucleon dissociation) and a minority to a hard component representing minimum-bias dijet production (corresponding to measured jet spectra and fragmentation functions). The hard-component hadron yield is precisely proportional to the square of the soft-component yield over an interval corresponding to 100-fold increase in dijet production. The two data descriptions appear to be in conflict. This study presents a detailed comparison of the two models and their relations to a broad array of collision data. The PMC appears to disagree with some data, whereas the TCM provides an accurate and comprehensive data description.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Thomas A. Trainor. 2018-05-23. Comparing the PYTHIA Monte Carlo to a two-component (soft + hard) model of hadron production in high-energy p-p collisions. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021830131950023x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.